NEWS & RESOURCES

Suffering a detriment for the purpose of victimisation

What is the case about?

In accordance with the Equality Act 2010, victimisation is defined when one person treats another person to a detriment either because that person has carried out a protected act or the first person believes the second person has carried out, or may carry out, a protected act.

A protected act includes bringing a claim under the Equality Act, giving evidence or information in connection to proceedings under the Act, doing any other thing for the purpose of or in connection with the Equality Act or making allegations, whether express or not, that somebody has contravened the Act.

In the case of Warburton v The Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police [2002] EAT 42 (14 March 2022), the Employment Appeal Tribunal considered what the test was for determining whether or not somebody had suffered a detriment for the purpose of victimisation, in accordance with the Equality Act 2010.

The circumstances

Mr Warburton had worked for Hertfordshire Constabulary and raised proceedings against them for unlawful discrimination. He subsequently applied to be a police officer for Northamptonshire Police and was successful in his application and so Northamptonshire Police commenced their vetting process.

However, Northamptonshire Police went on to withdraw the job offer citing that it was because Hertfordshire Constabulary failed to provide information meaning the vetting process couldn’t continue.

Mr Warburton though believed it to be because he had mentioned on his application form a protected act, i.e., he had taken proceedings against Hertfordshire Constabulary and went on to take proceedings against Northamptonshire Policy for victimisation claiming he had suffered a detriment.

The judgement

The Employment Tribunal did not find in favour of Mr Warburton and that Northamptonshire’s actions did not amount to a detriment under the Equality Act 2010, he appealed and took his case to the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT).

The EAT considered the test for what would amount to a detriment and concluded that it should be interpreted widely meaning that the original tribunal should have determined whether a reasonable worker might take the view that the conduct was detrimental rather than whether a reasonable tribunal considered the actions to be a detriment.

This judgement found that the original tribunal applied the wrong test when considering the case and so it has been sent back to be heard by another tribunal.

Learning points

The learning point from this case is more of a reminder of the test for determining whether victimisation has taken place. It is about whether a reasonable worker would or might take the view that they had been disadvantaged in the circumstances.

For employers who are dealing with grievances of alleged claims of victimisation, it is worth remembering to take account the employee’s view of what happened, and to particularly consider whether that view is a reasonable one to hold, given the circumstances.

We await the outcome of the re-hearing of this case back to the employment tribunal and it will be interesting if it arrives at the same conclusion when applying the correct test.

Further Information

For further guidance on this topic please contact us or get in touch with us on 0844 324, 5840 and speak to a member of the team.

SHARE THIS:

Instagram

GET IN TOUCH

Got questions? Looking for advice?

GET IN TOUCH

Got questions? Looking for advice?

RELATED RESOURCES

Explore our comprehensive library of related resources to gain valuable insights, expert tips, and helpful tools for optimising your HR practices.

SIGN-UP FOR UPDATES

Receive all the latest industry insights, expert tips and exciting updates from HR Solutions, straight to your inbox.

Strategic HR thinking whitepaper

Our latest HR whitepaper offers an in-depth analysis and strategic framework aimed at transforming Human Resources into a pivotal element of business success in the rapidly evolving corporate environment of 2024.

PARTNER REGISTRATION

Register your details below and we will contact you regarding how HR Solutions can support your organisation.

MAKE A GENERAL ENQUIRY

We’re here to assist you with any questions or enquiries you might have. Simply fill out the form below, and our dedicated team will get back to you.

REQUEST A PROPOSAL FROM US

We’re here to assist you with any questions or enquiries you might have. Simply fill out the form below, and our dedicated team will get back to you.

BOOK YOUR PLACE

Please complete the form and one of our team will call you back to discuss your query/booking.

Request your free trial

Register your details below and we will contact you about your 30 day free trial of the HR Knowledge Base.

REGISTRATION FORM

Register your details below and we will contact you about access to the HR Knowledge Base.  As part of your approved industry membership organisation you can get access to the HR Knowledge Base, created by Business HR Solutions, which is the go-to resource for thousands of business owners and managers across the UK.

2023/2024 SME BUSINESS SURVEY

Our latest 2023/24 SME Business Survey sheds light on the intricate dynamics shaping the SME sector and unveils critical insights that can guide businesses toward sustainable success.

IF YOU WISH TO PURCHASE HR ADVICE LINE TIME, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FORM BELOW.

HR Solutions are here to help. We offer a standard hourly rate package for ad hoc HR advice which means you can pay for what you need, whenever you need it, and then quickly get advice. Our highly experienced advisors are on hand to provide you with practical employment advice to help you manage your workforce.  You can purchase HR Advice Line time now, and the time purchased will be valid for 12 months.